Palavras-chave
Inteligência Artificial
Direito e Tecnologia
Discriminação Digital
Direitos Fundamentais
Como Citar
Resumo
O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar os desafios jurídicos associados ao fenômeno do racismo algorítmico, considerando a intersecção entre tecnologia, discriminação digital e direitos fundamentais. A pesquisa adota metodologia indutiva, de caráter exploratório e teórico, fundamentada em revisão bibliográfica interdisciplinar, incluindo doutrina jurídica, estudos críticos da ciência de dados e marcos normativos nacionais e internacionais, como a LGPD e o GDPR. O estudo evidencia que os sistemas de inteligência artificial, ao se basearem em dados históricos enviesados, podem reproduzir e amplificar desigualdades raciais, impactando negativamente o princípio da igualdade e a dignidade da pessoa humana. Conclui-se que é necessária uma regulação jurídica robusta, centrada na transparência algorítmica, na responsabilização multissetorial e na efetivação de uma justiça algorítmica antidiscriminatória, capaz de proteger os direitos fundamentais em ambientes digitais.
Referências
Almeida, Silvio. Structural Racism (Pólen 2018) [original title: Racismo Estrutural].
Benjamin, Ruha. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (Polity Press 2019).
Brazil. Law No. 13,709 of Aug. 14, 2018, Brazilian General Data Protection Law (LGPD), Diário Oficial da União [D.O.U.] of Aug. 15, 2018 (Braz.), http://www.planalto.gov.br.
Buolamwini, Joy & Gebru, Timnit. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification, 81 Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 1 (2018).
Calo, Ryan. Digital Market Manipulation, 82 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 995 (2014).
Citron, Danielle Keats & Pasquale, Frank. The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions, 89 Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2014).
Crawford, Kate & Schultz, Jason. Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms, 55 B.C. L. Rev. 93 (2014).
Eubanks, Virginia. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (St. Martin’s Press 2018).
European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 Apr. 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data (General Data Protection Regulation), 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.
European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), 2024 O.J. (L 1689).
Gillis, Thomas & Spiess, Joerg. Big Data and Discrimination: Lessons from the United States, 5 European Data Protection L. Rev. 258 (2019).
Hacker, Philipp & Petkova, Bogdana. Reining in the Big Promise of Big Data: Transparency, Inequality, and New Regulatory Frontiers, 15 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 1 (2017).
Kroll, Joshua A. et al. Accountable Algorithms, 165 U. Pa. L. Rev. 633 (2017).
Lepri, Bruno et al. Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-Making Processes, 31 Phil. & Tech. 611 (2018).
Mantelero, Alessandro et al. Bias in Social Media Content Management: What Do Human Rights Have to Do With It? (Geneva Acad. 2022), https://www.geneva-academy.ch/.
Miller, Claire. When Algorithms Discriminate, N.Y. Times (2015), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/10/upshot/when-algorithms-discriminate.html.
Noble, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (N.Y.U. Press 2018).
O’Neil, Cathy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (Crown Publ’g Grp. 2016).
OECD. OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence (2019), https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/.
Pasquale, Frank. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard Univ. Press 2015).
Ponce, Andrés et al. Bias and Discrimination in AI: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, SSRN (2021), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3842194.
Richardson, Rashida; Schultz, Jason & Craig, Kate. Dirty Data, Bad Predictions: How Civil Rights Violations Impact Police Data, Predictive Policing Systems, and Justice, 94 N.Y.U. L. Rev. Online 192 (2019).
Selbst, Andrew D. & Barocas, Solon. The Intuitive Appeal of Explainable Machines, 87 Fordham L. Rev. 1085 (2019).
Speicher, Till; Koch, Sebastian & Singer, Natasha. Potential Discrimination in Online Targeted Advertising, in WWW ’18: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference 933 (ACM 2018).
Sweeney, Latanya. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery, 11 ACM Queue 10 (2013).
UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2021), https://unesdoc.unesco.org/.
Wang, Xiaoyang et al. Algorithmic Discrimination: Examining Its Types and Regulatory Measures with Emphasis on US Legal Practices, 7 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (2024), https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1320277.
Zarsky, Tal Z. Transparent Predictions, 2013 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1503 (2013).
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (PublicAffairs 2019).
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Wellington José Campos