Keywords
application providers
Internet Civil Rights Framework
How to Cite
Abstract
In a scenario in which digital platforms, understood in this paper as internet application providers, especially from the point of view of social networks, have gone beyond social interaction and reached business environments, issues related to the moderation of content posted by their users have taken on new contours. In the Brazilian legal system, the matter has been regulated by the Marco Civil da Internet (Civil Rights Framework for the Internet) and is defended on the basis of freedom of expression, whose background is constitutional. However, the discussion surrounding the constitutionality of article 19 of the Marco Civil has reached the Supreme Court, signaling the possibility of extending the responsibility of application providers for the content posted by users. The debate deserves reflection, though, because, as will be shown, the exercise of power by digital platforms can go beyond the discourse of guaranteeing individual freedoms.
References
Brazil. Lei No. 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014 (Marco Civil da Internet). Available at http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l12965.htm (last visited May 25, 2024).
Brazil. Projeto de Lei No. 2.630/2020 (Chamber of Deputies). Available at https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=2256735 (last visited June 17, 2024).
Brazil. Senado Federal. Projeto de Lei No. 232/2017. Available at https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/130820 (last visited June 28, 2024).
Brega, Gabriel Ribeiro. A Regulação de Conteúdo nas Redes Sociais: Uma Breve Análise Comparativa entre o NetzDG e a Solução Brasileira, 19 Rev. Direito GV e2305 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202305.
Castells, Manuel, and Gustavo Cardoso eds., A Sociedade em Rede: Do Conhecimento à Ação Política (Imprensa Nacional 2005).
CGI.br. Resolução CGI.br/RES/2009/003/P. Available at https://www.cgi.br/resolucoes/documento/2009/003 (last visited June 26, 2024).
Dantas, Juliana de Oliveira Jota, and Leonardo Lima Mota Neto, Liberdade de Expressão versus Responsabilidade dos Provedores no Marco Civil da Internet, 21 Rev. AGU 143 (2022).
Douek, Evelyn. Content Moderation as Systems Thinking, 136 Harv. L. Rev. 526 (2022).
Frazão, Ana. Plataformas Digitais e os Desafios para sua Regulação Jurídica, in Direito, Tecnologia e Inovação (Editora D’Plácido 2018).
Frosio, Giancarlo. The Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability (Oxford Univ. Press 2020).
Hobaika, Marcelo Bechara de Souza. A Lei do Atrito e a Inconstitucionalidade do Art. 19 do Marco Civil da Internet, JOTA (May 17, 2024). Available at https://www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/artigos/a-lei-do-atrito-e-a-inconstitucionalidade-do-art-19-do-marco-civil-da-internet-17052024 (last visited May 25, 2024).
Intervozes, Em Defesa do Marco Civil, available at https://intervozes.org.br/em-defesa-do-marco-civil/ (last visited June 28, 2024).
Jobim, Nelson, and Renato Lemos, Parecer – Recurso Extraordinário Questiona Marco Civil da Internet no STF, ConJur (Dec. 9, 2019). Available at https://www.conjur.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/clique-aqui-ler-parecer-ronaldo-lemos.pdf (last visited June 25, 2024).
Klonick, Kate. The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech, 131 Harv. L. Rev. 1598 (2018).
Leonardo, Rodrigo Xavier. Controle de Constitucionalidade do Marco Civil da Internet, ConJur (Apr. 3, 2023). Available at https://www.conjur.com.br/2023-abr-03/direito-civil-atual-audiencia-publica-stf-controle-constitucionalidade-marco-civil-internet/ (last visited May 28, 2024).
Machado, Caio Vieira, Victor Durigan and Laura Pereira, PL das Fake News: Entenda o que é, Seu Impacto e as Principais Críticas, JOTA (Apr. 18, 2022). Available at https://www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/artigos/pl-das-fake-news-entenda-o-que-e-seu-impacto-e-as-principais-criticas-18042022 (last visited May 27, 2024).
Mendes, Laura Schertel. Remarks at USP Seminar Democracia e Plataformas Digitais (2024), available at https://youtu.be/ANfK8RIY1ho (last visited May 24, 2024).
Mulligan, Deirdre K., and Kenneth A. Bamberger, Allocating Responsibility in Content Moderation: A Functional Framework, 36 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1091 (2021).
Nitrini, Rodrigo Vidal. Liberdade de Expressão nas Redes Sociais: O Problema Jurídico da Remoção de Conteúdo pelas Plataformas (Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of São Paulo, 2020).
Nunes, Dierle, and Matheus Miranda Maciel, O Polêmico Artigo 19 do Marco Civil da Internet e o Dilema da Moderação de Conteúdo, ConJur (May 11, 2024). Available at https://www.conjur.com.br/2024-mai-11/o-polemico-artigo-19-do-marco-civil-da-internet-e-o-dilema-da-moderacao-de-conteudo/ (last visited May 24, 2024).
Saldías, Osvaldo. Coded for Export! The Contextual Dimension of the Brazilian Marco Civil da Internet, Alexander von Humboldt Discussion Paper 2014–06 (2014).
Souza, Carlos Affonso, and Ronaldo Lemos, Marco Civil da Internet: Construção e Aplicação (Editar 2016).
Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), REsp 1.501.603/RN, Rel. Min. Nancy Andrighi (Dec. 2017). Available at https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/pesquisa/?aplicacao=processos.ea&tipoPesquisa=tipoPesquisaGenerica&termo=REsp%201501603 (last visited June 26, 2024).
Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), REsp 1.512.647/MG, Rel. Min. Luís Felipe Salomão, DJe Aug. 15, 2015. Available at
https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente=ATC&sequencial=45693836&num_registro=201301628832&data=20150805&tipo=91&formato=PDF (last visited June 26, 2024).
Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), Inquérito 4.957, Rel. Min. Alexandre de Moraes. Available at https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=6893258 (last visited June 17, 2024).
Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), RE 1.037.396/SP, Rel. Min. Dias Toffoli, Tema 987 – Repercussão Geral, DJe Apr. 5, 2017. Available at https://www.stf.jus.br/portal/jurisprudenciaRepercussao/verAndamentoProcesso.asp?incidente=5160549&numeroProcesso=1037396&classeProcesso=RE&numeroTema=987 (last visited May 26, 2024).
Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), RE 1.057.258/MG, Rel. Min. Luiz Fux, Tema 533 – Repercussão Geral, DJe June 27, 2017. Available at https://www.stf.jus.br/portal/jurisprudenciaRepercussao/verAndamentoProcesso.asp?incidente=5217273&numeroProcesso=1057258&classeProcesso=RE&numeroTema=533 (last visited May 26, 2024).
Teffé, Chiara Spadaccini de, and Carlos Affonso Souza, Responsabilidade Civil de Provedores na Rede: Análise da Aplicação do Marco Civil da Internet pelo STJ, 1 Rev. IBERC 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.37963/iberc.v1i1.6.
Tomasevicius Filho, Eduardo. Marco Civil da Internet: Uma Lei sem Conteúdo Normativo, 30 Estudos Avançados 269 (2016).
Volokh, Eugene. The Reverse Spider-Man Principle: With Great Responsibility Comes Great Power, 3 J. Free Speech L. 197 (2023).
Wikipedia, Primeira Emenda à Constituição dos Estados Unidos da América, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primeira_Emenda_%C3%A0_Constitui%C3%A7%C3%A3o_dos_Estados_Unidos (last visited July 3, 2024).
X (formerly Twitter). Elon Musk (@elonmusk), X (Apr. 6, 2024, 7:44 PM), https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1776475718383534148. (last visited Apr. 22, 2024)
X (formerly Twitter), Transparency Reports. Available at https://transparency.x.com/pt/reports/rules-enforcement.html#2021-jul-dec (last visited Apr. 22, 2024).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Laurence Duarte Araújo Pereira, Maelle Antunes Pereira Lima, Maria Cláudia Viana Hissa Dias do Vale Gangana