Civil liability in AI diagnostic analysis
PDF

Keywords

civil liability
artificial intelligence
diagnostic analysis

How to Cite

Reis, G. da S. (2024). Civil liability in AI diagnostic analysis: theories and regulatory challenges. Brazilian Journal of Law, Technology and Innovation, 2(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.59224/bjlti.v2i1.193-209

Abstract

The aim of this article is to raise thoughts about possible adaptations to the classic theories of civil liability applied to health, in the face of the use of medical devices with Artificial Intelligence (AI). The article seeks to situate readers in relevant aspects of the topic and to help with a general understanding of the proposed issue. The results of the study indicate the problem of the emerging behavior of machines, as well as the lack of definition of what would be the diligence expected of a doctor in the context of diagnostic analysis. It is argued that it is unreasonable to compare the data processing capacity of an artificial intelligence with the ability of a human doctor in the investigation of guilt. The final considerations reveal some changes in the interpretation of the assumptions of civil liability.

https://doi.org/10.59224/bjlti.v2i1.193-209
PDF

References

Barbosa, Mafalda Miranda. Inteligência Artificial: entre a utopia e a distopia, alguns problemas jurídicos. Coimbra: Gestlegal, 2021.

Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Justiça em números 2022. Brasília, 2022. Available at: <https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/justica-em-numeros-2022-1.pdf> [Accessed 28 Jun. 2023].

Brasil. Lei No. 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002. Institui o Código Civil. Diário Oficial da União, seção 1, Brasília, DF, 11 Jan. 2002.

Brasil. Lei No. 8.078, de 11 de setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre a proteção do consumidor e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 1990.

Brasil. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial No. 1.335.622 - DF (2012/0041973-0). Recorrente: Alberdan Nascimento de Araújo. Advogado: Jose Emiliano Paes Landim Neto. Recorrido: Hospital Santa Lúcia S/A. Advogado: Roberto de Souza Moscoso. Relator: Ministro Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva. Brasília, DF, 18 Dec. 2012.

Brasil. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial No. 1.187.456 - DF. Recorrente: Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Recorrido: João Cruz e outro. Relator: Ministro Castro Meira. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 16 Nov. 2010.

European Commission. Artificial Intelligence Act. Strasbourg, 14 Jun. 2023. Available at: <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-06-14_EN.html> [Accessed 26 Jun. 2023].

European Commission. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI: High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Brussels, 08 Apr. 2019. Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=60419> [Accessed 28 Jun. 2023].

European Commission. Resolução 2020/2014 (Inl). Brussels, 20 Oct. 2020. Available at: <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0276_PT.html> [Accessed 27 Jun. 2023].

European Commission. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence. Brussels, 19 Feb. 2020. Available at: <https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-02/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf> [Accessed 28 Jun. 2023].

Farias, Cristiano Chaves de; Rosenvald, Nelson; Braga Netto, Felipe. Curso de Direito Civil: responsabilidade civil. 10th ed. São Paulo: Juspodivm, 2023.

Gillespie, Stuart. The Oxford spinout company using AI to diagnose heart disease. 2018. Available at: <https://www.research.ox.ac.uk/Article/2018-10-15-the-oxford-spinout-company-using-ai-to-diagnose-heart-disease> [Accessed 24 Jun. 2023].

IBM. Manual, IBM Japan Sales. IBM Watson for Oncology SaaS (5725-W51). 2022. Available at: <https://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_sm/1/760/ENUS5725-W51/index.html> [Accessed 26 Jun. 2023].

Kfouri Neto, Miguel. Responsabilidade Civil dos Hospitais. 4th ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2019.

Kfouri Neto, Miguel, and Rafaella Nogaroli (ed.). Debates contemporâneos em direito médico e da saúde. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brasil, 2020.

Lima, Cíntia Rosa Pereira de. Sistema de Responsabilidade Civil para Carros Autônomos. Indaiatuba: Editora Foco, 2023.

Medon, Filipe. Inteligência Artificial e Responsabilidade Civil: Autonomia, Riscos e Solidariedade. Salvador: Editora Juspodivm, 2022.

Medon, Filipe. O anteprojeto de Marco Legal da Inteligência Artificial. Migalhas de Responsabilidade Civil. 2022. Available at: <https://www.migalhas.com.br/coluna/migalhas-de-responsabilidade-civil/378241/o-anteprojeto-de-marco-legal-da-inteligencia-artificial> [Accessed 28 Jun. 2023].

Parentoni, Leonardo. What Should We Reasonably Expect from Artificial Intelligence? SSRN Electronic Journal (2022). Available at: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4162871 [Accessed June 24, 2023]. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4162871.

Silva, Rodrigo da Guia, and Rafaella Nogaroli. Inteligência artificial na análise diagnóstica: benefícios, riscos e responsabilidade do médico. In: Debates Contemporâneos em Direito Médico e da Saúde. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2020.

Zaparolli, Domingos. A inteligência artificial chega à saúde. 2022. Available at: <https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/a-inteligencia-artificial-chega-a-saude/> [Accessed 28 Jun. 2023].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriella da Silva Reis