Palavras-chave
Previsão
análise bibliométrica
Justiça
criminalidade
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo apresenta uma análise detalhada da evolução e das perspectivas futuras no campo da segurança pública, empregando métodos bibliométricos e prospectivos. A análise bibliométrica examina o desenvolvimento histórico da pesquisa até 2023, identificando padrões, principais áreas de estudo e autores influentes. Esse entendimento profundo do passado estabelece a base para a análise prospectiva, que utiliza métodos de previsão para antecipar cenários possíveis e tendências emergentes em segurança pública. Ao combinar essas abordagens, o estudo oferece uma visão abrangente das dinâmicas passadas e futuras do campo. Os resultados da análise bibliométrica fornecem um entendimento sólido das fundações sobre as quais pesquisas futuras podem ser construídas. Por meio da análise prospectiva, o artigo explora direções futuras potenciais, desafios críticos e oportunidades no âmbito da segurança pública.
Referências
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
Bélanger, Y., et al. (2011). A bibliometric analysis of scientific research in information systems. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 2-12.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks. SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chermack, T. J. (2011). Scenario Planning in Organizations: How to Create, Use, and Assess Scenarios. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cohen, J., et al. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
De Winter, J. C., et al. (2018). Using bibliometrics to explore the bias against women researchers in environmental sciences. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0208598.
Felson, M. (2006). Crime and nature. Sage.
Gartner 2023, Law Enforcement and Public Safety - https://www.gartner.com/interactive/hc/4565499
Gartner 2022, Justice and Law Enforcement Vision 2022: Intelligent Integrated Justice - https://www.gartner.com/document/4015790
Gartner 2023, Predictions 2023: Justice and Public Security - https://www.gartner.com/document/4023201
Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2006). Evaluation of foresight work: Practical aspects and operational experiences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 464-482.
Godet, M. (2006). Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. Economica.
Godet, M. (2006). Introduction to Prospective and Foresight. Futures, 38(7), 513-26.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford University Press.
Janssen, M., et al. (2012). Advancing the understanding of behavior in social-ecological systems: Results from lab and field experiments. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 1.
Kessler, R. C., et al. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602.
Klievink, B., et al. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of public values research in information systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Public Values & Public Interest (pp. 1-12).
Mardani, A., et al. (2015). Using bibliometric method for engineering education research: A case study on IEEE Xplore database. European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(6), 625-639.
Molas-Gallart, J., & Castro-Martínez, E. (2007). Tensions in public research policy: Challenges for the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy, 36(5), 723-735.
Moresi, E. A. D., & Pinho, I. (2021). Proposta de abordagem para refinamento de pesquisa bibliográfica. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 9, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.11-20
Moresi, E. A. D., Pinho, I., & Costa, A. P. (2021). Análise bibliométrica: uma abordagem quantitativa e qualitativa. In 18th CONTECSI 2021 - Proceedings. DOI: 10.5748/18CONTECSI/PSE/LIS/6736
Newman, M. E. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
Ray, B. (2023). "Maverick* Research: LEO Satellites Will Trigger the Revolution That 5G Has Failed to Deliver." Gartner.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924.
Scott, J. (2017). Social network analysis. Sage.
Tyler, R. (1975). Assessing the Impact of Futures Research on Public Policy. Futures, 7(3), 216-229.
Tyler, R. (1975). Foresight: Its Models and Methods. Futures, 7(2), 110–133.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12070
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sidney Arruda, Petersend Brito, Lucas Akai, Afrânio Cavalcante