Abstract
In this paper the complex relationship between law and information technologies is explored, focusing on the challenges posed by the widespread use of technology and the electronic processing of data. Jurists are confronted with the need to re-examine traditional legal concepts in various domains due to the transformative impact of information technologies. Lawyers and judges must also grapple with the implications of utilizing sophisticated tools, including artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, which require careful consideration of their effects on the evolution of the law. Of particular concern is the potential for algorithms to function as judges, making legal decisions based on autonomous algorithmic systems, albeit under human supervision. This study examines this possibility in light of three key functions: information collection and processing, risk assessment, and decision-making in legally relevant cases. The analysis aims to shed light on the (im)possibility of algorithmic judging while considering the broader implications of these technological advancements.
References
Aletras, Nikolaos, Vasileios Lampos, Dimitrios Tsarapatanis & Daniel Preoțiuc-Pietro, “Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a natural language processing perspective”, 293 PeerJ Computer Science 2016.
Bostrom, Nick. “A history of transhumanist thought”, 14 Journal of Evolution and Technology, Issue 1, 2005, https://nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf.
Buchanan, Bruce G., & Thomas Headrick, “Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning”, 23 Stanford Law Review 1979.
Coats, Pamela K. “Why expert systems fail”, 17-3 Financial Management 1988.
Domingos, Pedro. A revolução do algoritmo mestre. Como a aprendizagem automática está a mudar o mundo, Manuscrito Editora, 2017.
Floridi, Luciano. “AI as agency withtout intelligence: on ChatGPT, large language models and other generative models”, Philosophy and Technology, 2023, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4358789.
Jackson, Peter. Introduction to Expert Systems, Addison Wesley, Portland, 1998.
Joshi, Kailash. “Expert Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence”, https://www.umsl.edu/~joshik/msis480/chapt11.htm.
Kurzweil, Ray. Singularity is near, Viking, 2005.
Lavouras, Matilde. “O algoritmo mestre: um bem público global?”, Boletim de Ciências Económicas 2021.
Luhmann, Niklas. Recht und Automation in der öffentlichen Verwaltung, 1966.
Mitchell, Melanie. “Why AI is Harder Than We Think”, Computer Science. Artificial Intelligence, arXiv:2104.12871, 2021, 5 s., https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12871v2.
Neves, A. Castanheira. “Escola da Exegese”, in Digesta – Escritos acerca do direito, do pensamento jurídico, da sua metodologia e outros, II, Coimbra Editora, Coimbra, 1995.
Neves, A. Castanheira. “Escola Histórica do Direito”, in Digesta – Escritos acerca do direito, do pensamento jurídico, da sua metodologia e outros, II, Coimbra Editora, Coimbra, 1995.
Neves, A. Castanheira. “O papel do jurista nos nossos tempos”, in Digesta – Ensaios acerca do Direito, do Pensamento Jurídico, da sua Metodologia e outros, I, Coimbra Editora, Coimbra, 1995.
Neves, A. Castanheira. Metodologia Jurídica. Problemas Fundamentais, Coimbra Editora, Coimbra, 1993.
Ng, Irene. “The Art of Contract Drafting in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study Based on US, UK and Austrian Law”, 26 Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum 2017, http://ttlf.stanford.edu.
O’Sullivan, Conor, & Joeran Beel, “Predicting the outcome of judicial decisions made by the European Court of Human Rights”, arXiv:1912.10819.
Popp, Walter, & Dieter Suhr, Computer als juristischer Gesprächspartner: ein Arbeitspapier zu programmierten dialogischen Denkhilfen für die Jurisprudenz, J. Schweitzer, Berlim, 1970.
Rissland, Edwina L. “Anne von der Lieth Gardner, An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1987 reviewed by”, I Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 1988.
Schneider, Jochen. “Processamento electrónico de dados – informática jurídica”, in Introdução à filosofia do direito e à teoria do direito contemporâneas (Kaufman/Hassemer org.), FCG, Lisboa, 2002.
Shan, Ning, & Wojciech Ziarko, “Data-based acquisition and incremental modification of classification rules”, 11-2 Computational Intelligence 1995.
Sunstein, Cass R. “Of artificial intelligence and legal reasoning”, Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory, working Paper n.18, 2001, https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles.
Surden, Harry. “Machine Learning and Law”, 89 Washington Law Review 2014.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Mafalda Miranda Barbosa